Connect with us

General News

Bobrisky Files N1 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against VeryDarkMan

Published

on

By Admin

Controversial crossdresser Bobrisky has filed a N1 billion defamation lawsuit against social media personality Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan. The lawsuit comes after an audio clip, in which Bobrisky allegedly accused operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) of extorting N15 million from him, went viral.

In the clip, Bobrisky purportedly claimed that the EFCC dropped money laundering charges against him in exchange for the payment.

However, Bobrisky has dismissed the audio as a fabricated piece generated using artificial intelligence (AI), designed to damage his reputation.

Through his legal representatives, R.

T. Omuvwie & Co., Bobrisky released an official statement on Sunday, accusing VeryDarkMan of leveraging his name and image to gain social media fame.

The statement highlighted that the viral audio clip and the accompanying commentary had severely impacted Bobrisky’s public image, brand, and personal life.

In the letter, Bobrisky demands that VeryDarkMan immediately withdraw the AI-generated audio and all defamatory statements.

Bobrisky also demands a public apology to be published in two national newspapers and across all of VeryDarkMan’s social media channels, along with a written commitment to cease further defamatory publications and N1 billion in damages.

Failure to meet these demands within 24 hours, according to Bobrisky’s legal team, will result in further legal action.

See also  IPCR decries inadequate early warning response in Nigeria, canvasses stronger collaboration

The letter reads, “That in recent times you alleged our client in one of your trending videos on various social media platforms that various DIGs of the Nigeria Police force, lawmakers, senators and politicians generally were in the habit of having sexual intercourse with our client wherein you are yet to provide proof of same till date.

“That you continued to make reckless and unfounded statement including hearsay statement that you cannot prove against our client, not minding his mental health and his general well-being, including his right to privacy and right to freedom of thought, right to life and other constitutional fundamental rights of our client.

“That one will think that after such attempts against our client that you would exercise some level of caution or restrain, considering the safety and wellbeing of our client but your goals are personal and self-uplifting for you and your backers, hence you have made it a life goal task to fulfill it by all means notwithstanding its negative effect on our client and other persons who may be caught in your unguided attacks.

“That it has come to the attention of our client that you recently published an Artificial intelligence generated audio call, claiming that same was between an unnamed individual and our client, for the record our client never had any audio conversation with this fellow who you claim to represent and that your act of defamation and blackmail should be withdrawn against our client within 24 hours of the service of this letter of demand via social media platforms.”

0Shares
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *