General News
NDDC: More trouble Waters for Onochie as Court Sacks her 18 Aides
The Federal High Court sitting in Warri, Delta State sacked 18 aides illegally appointed by the Chairperson of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), Ms. Lauretta Onochie.
Delivery judgment in a suit by Dr.
she was barred from interfering with the functions of the commission’s Managing Director, Dr.
The suit had NDDC, Onochie, and Ogbuku are the first, second, and third defendants.
The plaintiff sought an interpretation of the NDDC Act 2000 following some actions by Onochie believed to be against the Act
A copy of the judgment, signed by the Court Registrar, Anigboro Enonuya, showed it was delivered by Justice Okon Abang.
Justice Abang said having considered the provisions of the NDDC Establishment Act 2000 and the circular issued by the office of the Accountant-General of the Federation dated January 16, Onochie is to oversee and preside over meetings of the board on a part-time basis.
The judge held that the managing director, as the chief executive and accounting officer of the NDDC, is saddled with the responsibility of the day-to-day running and management of the agency.
He held that Onochie’s unilateral decision to appoint 18 aides in her office and the demand for an executive office in the commission are in contravention of relevant provisions of the NDDC Act and the circulars released by the Federal Government on the subject matter of the plaintiff’s claims.
Justice Abang held: “The third defendant as Managing Director of the NDDC is the person statutorily empowered by the NDDC Act to perform and wield executive functions, powers, and day-to-day running and management of the commission to the exclusion of other members of the board of the NDDC, including the second defendant (the chairman).”
“All actions of the second defendant, including but not limited to the appointment of her aides carried out in the exercise of executive functions and powers in the NDDC since her assumption of duty on January 4, 2023, are ultra vires her powers and therefore null and void and of no consequences whatsoever.
“The second defendant is restrained from carrying out/and or exercising any executive functions in the NDDC.
“The second defendant is further restrained from interfering with the third defendant’s (MD’s) executive functions, powers, day-to-day running and management of the NDDC.”
The court also awarded a cost of N100,000 against the board chairman, payable to the plaintiff.
The judgment was dated May 9, 2023, but the certified true copy of the same was obtained yesterday.