Connect with us

Uncategorized

Published

on

law on National Anthem by Legislative Fiat is not ideal —AGF , others warn NASS

By Iyojo Ameh

Move by the National Assembly to expeditiously pass a bill for an Act on National Anthem with major aim of replacing the current one with the old ,
suffered set back on Monday in Senate , with warning that such an important issue should not be done by legislative fiat.

Speaking at the Public hearing on the bill organized by the Senate Committee on Judiciary , Human Rights and Legal Matters , the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice , Prince Lateef Fagbemi , warned that the issue of National Anthem , should not be treated with legislative fiat .

He said as commendable as the move by both Chambers of the National Assembly may be , on enacting law on National Anthem or replacing the current with the old , Nigerians must be carried along for their required ” buy in”.

He said : “In some cases, national anthem emerges from open national competition among interested citizens. In other instances, the proposed national anthem is subjected to plebiscite or referendum, before its eventual adoption or declaration.

“The essence of the foregoing is to secure the buy-in and confidence of the people and to ensure that the anthem meets their collective aspirations and suits their contemporary socio-political conditions.

See also  BREAKING: Political Parties ask for cancellation of 2023 presidential election

“Against the background of the foregoing,
I am of the considered opinion that the revered issue of choice of a national item should not come into being only by legislative fiat, or presidential proclamation alone.

“Consequently, it is my considered view that the decision to change Nigeria’s National Anthem whether by replacing it with the old one or a new one, should be subjected to a wider process of citizen participation through zonal public hearings, resolutions of the Federal Executive Council, Council of State, National and State Assemblies, etc.

“The outcome of this process is bound to be a true reflection of the wishes of the generality or majority of Nigerians”.

In his submission at the public hearing , the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Alhaji Mohammed Idris Malagi , recommended that the scope should be expanded to include a robust issue on national identity rather than limiting it to change of national anthem.

The Minister who was represented by the Director-General of National Orientation Agency ( NOA) , Mr Lanre Issa-Onilu, noted that some lines in the old national anthem does not make a complete meaning.

“The issue of national anthem is just a sub-sect. What we should be looking at is the National Identity Act.

“The challenge we have today is that we do not have a value national identity which the national anthem is one of them. It is not about singing in schools, it is about learning it and imbibing it” he said .

See also  Presidential election: Gov. Sule congratulates Asiwaju Ahmed Bole Tinibu president elect ...says victory is Nigerians confidence on Tinibu

Also cautioning the National Assembly on expeditious passage of the bill, Chief Mike Ozekhome ( SAN ) , called for wider consultations for Nigerians to accept whatever National Anthem is proposed and buy into it .

According to him, the National Assembly should widen the scope of participation in the process of coming up with such an Act for general acceptability .

He however supported the move to replace the current” Arise O Compatriots ” National Anthem with the ” Nigeria , We Hail Thee” , the country started with , in October 1960 .

He said such a move was long overdue since the current National Anthem adopted in 1978 , does not have the required gravitas and not inspirational to fire the passion and zeal for Nationhood among Nigerians.

Nigeria according to him , will not be the first country in the world to replace current National Anthem with the old one as over 20 countries like Russia , Austria , Chile, France , Saudi Arabia , China , Brazil, Iran , Iraq etc , have done so at different times in the past .

Other Stakeholders in their submissions , preferred the old National Anthem to the current one .

0Shares
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *